Skip to content
Menu

Key Person Risk: A Continuity Packet Your MSP Can Show

Address key person risk with an MSP continuity packet. Name service cover and check the contact and access routes for an answer clients can verify.

MSP colleagues and a client review a continuity packet with named cover contacts to address key person risk

When a client asks about key person risk, don't reply with how committed the owner is. Say: 'Here's who takes the service lead if I'm unavailable, and here's how you'll reach them.' Then show the client the continuity packet and the checked operating arrangement behind that statement.

The packet should explain what the client does and who your MSP has authorized to act. Keep the detailed access instructions in the controlled internal plan. You can't answer an owner-dependency concern by giving the client a document that still requires the owner to explain it.

Find the Concern Behind the Question

Ask the client: 'What would you need to keep working if you couldn't reach me?' Use their answer to identify the service or decision the packet must address. They may need a contact for an active problem, or they may be asking who could make an urgent commercial decision.

Don't answer those as if they were the same job. Name the service authority and the route for decisions beyond it. Confirm the arrangement with the people actually authorized to provide that cover before describing it to the client.

Ray J. Green recommends following up a prospect's wording before assuming what it means or offering a rebuttal. That is his discovery advice. Use the same discipline when a client asks whether the business depends on you, rather than giving a rehearsed answer to a different concern.

I'd avoid the sales advice to reassure the buyer with the founder's personal commitment. It fails here because an MSP needs people who can carry the client work and the access required to do it. A confident introduction doesn't give a replacement technician either.

Check the Operating Cover Before Writing the Promise

The model's goal is recurring, profitable revenue without reliance on the owner. Turn that into an operating check: identify the work that currently needs the owner and the role that will carry it during an absence. Don't describe a cover arrangement as ready while its responsibilities remain unresolved.

Have the service lead confirm who can assign work and coordinate an incident. Have the account owner confirm the client communication role. Keep any spending or contractual decisions with the person whose authority has actually been established.

A colleague named in the packet must know what they have agreed to carry. Check their coverage and how another authorized person takes over when they are unavailable. If a gap remains, decide how to address it and communicate the actual limit instead of filling it with a reassuring title.

Give the Client a Packet They Can Use

Keep the client-facing packet specific to the service relationship. It should point the client to the action they can take without giving them your internal administrative secrets. I'd use this working structure:

Packet SectionWhat the Client NeedsWho Keeps It Current
Support routeHow to report work under the existing agreement and reach the urgent route where applicable.Service lead
Cover contactsWho coordinates the service and who owns the client update when the owner is unavailable.Service lead and account owner
Decision boundariesWhich decisions the covering people can make and the route for decisions outside that authority.Authorized business decision owner
Access continuity summaryWho can activate the approved access procedure, with a controlled internal reference rather than the credentials.Technical or security lead
Client responsibilitiesWhich authorized client contacts or approvals may be needed during the response.Account owner with the client
Validation and updatesThe relevant last check and who resolves a changed contact or failed step.Named continuity-plan owner

Keep the version and responsible contact visible so the client can identify an out-of-date copy. Explain which channel will carry an updated packet. Don't leave a corrected telephone number in your internal plan while the client keeps using the old one.

Walk the packet with the client's authorized contact. Ask them to show how they would report the problem without contacting the owner personally. Correct the point where the written route stops being usable.

Keep Credentials Behind the Authorized Procedure

The internal access record should identify where the required credentials are held and who may obtain or use them. The technical lead checks that the cover team can follow the approved procedure without depending on the absent owner's personal availability. Keep the means of access protected rather than attaching passwords to the client packet.

Apply the current product-specific procedure to the relevant system. A general continuity packet doesn't establish that an emergency account has been configured correctly.

Check client systems as well as the MSP's own administrative tools. The person able to dispatch a technician may not be authorized to approve access in a client tenant. Identify the client authorization route and any provider dependency before promising that the covering technician can act.

If the current access path depends on the owner's personal account or device, have the responsible technical lead design the authorized alternative. Check it through the applicable change process. Don't present credential sharing as the cover plan.

Show the Check Behind the Statement

Ask yourself: 'Can the replacement use this without me?' Have the assigned covering people perform an authorized exercise against the work the packet describes. Record where they could proceed and where they needed information only the owner held.

Use a safe exercise scope rather than disrupting a client's production service just to demonstrate preparedness. Confirm the escalation contact can be reached and the relevant records can be found. Where an access check is authorized, record its result without putting the secret into the exercise notes.

Give every failed step an owner and a required next decision. Revise the packet where the client-facing instruction was wrong, and revise the internal plan where the operating step failed. A polished packet is not a substitute for that work.

Use the relevant check and its result when explaining your arrangement to the client. Don't turn a limited exercise into a guarantee that every future outage will be resolved within a fixed time.

Use a Plain Client Talk Track

Open the account conversation with: 'We've written down how your support continues if the owner is unavailable. Let's check the contact route and any decisions that need your approval.' Keep the conversation about the service the client receives.

If the client says they only know the owner, reply: 'I'll introduce the person who'll coordinate the service, and we'll check that they can use the records they need.' Only describe that person as ready after the operating check supports it. Make an unresolved gap explicit while you arrange the work to close it.

If the client asks for the owner's credentials, say: 'We'll show you the authorized access process and who can activate it. We won't put administrative passwords in this packet.' Then explain the client's own approval or access role where it applies.

If the client asks whether service is guaranteed, point to the actual agreement and the verified cover. Say: 'Here's what we've checked, and here's the remaining limitation and its owner.' Don't invent a restoration promise to avoid an uncomfortable answer.

Keep the Packet Connected to the Working Business

The model's standard-stack principle supports training colleagues on the environment they may need to operate. Keep the shared records usable by those covering people. A standard product name doesn't remove a client's particular authorization or configuration dependency.

Review the packet when the people or responsibilities it names change. Include changes to the access procedure in that review. Have the plan owner decide when another exercise is required from what changed and the consequence of failure, rather than copying an arbitrary calendar promise.

Start with a client whose service still routes important decisions through the owner. Write the contact and authority gap, assign the work needed to cover it, and check the resulting route with the people who will use it. Bring the packet to the client when it describes an arrangement you can demonstrate.

Written ByNatalie Brandt

Staff Writer, Sales. Natalie Brandt covers sales for MSP Outpost: prospecting, discovery, proposals and closing, written for people who sell managed services, not software.

More by Natalie

mspoutpost.com/articles/key-person-risk-a-continuity-packet-your-msp-can-show

Written by Natalie Brandt
MSP Outpost publishes information, not legal, financial, insurance, tax or compliance advice, and reading it creates no professional relationship. For decisions about your business, talk to a qualified professional.

Sources1
  1. Practitioner discovery advice: Ray J. Green recommends following up a prospect’s words before assuming their meaning or presenting a rebuttal. He uses overkill to distinguish cost concerns, usability friction and doubts about security value, and resptranscripts.captivate.fm

Welcome Back

Sign in to your MSP Outpost account.